• Monday, October 26, 2026

    adjustercom.net

    MENU

    Fraud from inside and outside the courtroom - at adjustercom.net

  • PL: 3
  • PL: 3
  • PL: 3
  • PL: 3
  • PL: 3
  • PL: 3
  • Businessman Khaled Ghandour files a Cross Complaint against Dr. Munir Uwaydah protesting a judgment procured by outrageous and outlandish Fraud. He demands a trial by jury for all his claims asserted.

    Imagine you’re a defendant in a case filed against you. But then imagine an actor hired by the Plaintiff comes into the court room and you have absolutely no idea. You’re somewhere else. You live in Lebanon and have never been to California.

    Khaled Ghandour attorney writes in his cross-complaint that it “arises from one of the most shocking and egregious frauds ever perpetuated on this court.”

    “On the morning of December 7, 2009, an imposter hired by Uwaydah in the underlying case posed as Ghandour at the trial, purported to authenticate forged stipulations, then proceeded to concede liability and millions in damages. “

    As described in the purported trial transcript, following the conclusion of the “trial”, the Court and the court reporter could hardly believe their senses:

    The Court: This is pretty extraordinary for me, to see this level of cooperation. Have you ever seen that, Ruthy?
    The Reporter Ruthy: Never.
    The Court: Must go down in history.

    As expressed in the Purported Trial Transcript, the Imposter spoke... Read More

    Khaled Ghandour's answer to Dr. Uwaydah's Second Amended Complaint finally comes to an end at his 20th affirmative defense

    It began in the year 2001 when Lebanese businessman Khaled Ghandour invested $300,000 into Dr. Munir Uwaydah's Prometheus Health Imaging, Inc.  Ghandour and Uwaydah sat down in Beirut, Lebanon, signed the Prometheus bylaws, and then... Read More

    Khaled Ghandour excels with affirmative defenses against Dr. Uwaydah’s Second Amended Complaint.  He argues truly appropriate doctrines of equitable estoppel and judicial estoppel.

    Khaled Ghandour, a Lebanese businessman, who was sued by Dr. Munir Uwaydah in the year 2008, has retaliated with his Answer to a Second Amended Complaint from Uwaydah claiming the businessman owes him over $14,000,000.  Munir Uwaydah set up a bench trial in Santa Monica Superior Court in February of 2009, and brought in an... Read More

    Khaled Ghandour’s response to Dr. Uwaydah’s Second Amended Complaint.  Ghandour answers in a powerful voice alleging egregious fraud.  

    The infamous Dr. Munir Uwaydah filed a Second Amended Complaint against Lebanese businessman Khaled Ghandour.    In it he finally revealed the identity of the company to which he assigned the $6,000,000 Judgment from the year 2010 against Ghandour.  He assigned it to Pacific Mutual, Inc. a Nevis corporation.  This assignment was made and dated... Read More

    Second Amended Complaint filed by Dr. Munir Uwaydah against businessman Khaled Ghandour names Pacific Mutual Inc. as the company to which the six-million-dollar judgment was assigned.

    The Second Amended Complaint by Dr. Munir Uwaydah against Lebanese businessman Khaled Ghandour has now been filed.  It was filed on June 5th 2026.  In Stanley Mosk civil court in downtown Los Angeles on May 6th 2026, Khaled Ghandour’s demurrer against Uwaydah’s First Amended Complaint was sustained with leave to amend.  It was demanded by... Read More

    When defense attorneys go overboard for their clients. Part II.

    Back to attorney Matthew Rifat’s potential disbarment:  The Review Department of the California Bar Association’s Office of Chief Trial Counsel sent a powerful letter to the California Supreme Court recommending that Matthew be disbarred for one year, but for that disbarment to be stayed.  The stay would stay if Matthew completes all the requirements of... Read More

    When defense attorneys go overboard for their clients.  Lawyers Benjamin Gluck and Matthew Rifat went too far. 

    There are defense attorneys who believe insurance carriers are always coming up with tactics they can use not to pay claims.  One of them is to threaten medical providers with fraud.  And lawyers who are always pro-medical-provider, who have a prejudice in thinking it’s always the insurance company who’s the bad guy, can miss it... Read More

    Fraud defendant who gets his case dismissed is lucky.  But when he sues the prosecutors and insurers, he isn’t grateful but vengeful. 

    This is the case of Hassan Fayad vs. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. et al, in U.S. District Court, of Michigan, the Southern Division.  Plaintiff Hassan Fayed owned businesses providing transportation, diagnostics, testing, and therapy services.  He regularly billed insurance companies for these services.  He was arrested and tried for fraud and then convicted.  He subsequently... Read More
  • PL: 3
  • PL: 3
  • PL: 3